Sustainable marketing: an exploratory study of a sustain‐centric, versus profit‐centric, approach

As the need for business to address pressing social and ecological issues intensifies, so does the importance of enhancing the development of sustainable marketing. The current dominant approach to sustainable marketing is based on a Triple Bottom Line (TBL) profit‐centric worldview, which suggests...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBusiness and society review (1974) Vol. 128; no. 2; pp. 195 - 216
Main Authors Dyck, Bruno, Manchanda, Rajesh V., Vagianos, Savanna, Bernardin, Michèle
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As the need for business to address pressing social and ecological issues intensifies, so does the importance of enhancing the development of sustainable marketing. The current dominant approach to sustainable marketing is based on a Triple Bottom Line (TBL) profit‐centric worldview, which suggests that firms can simultaneously improve their financial well‐being as they reduce negative social and ecological externalities. However, whereas the scope of TBL marketing is limited to sustainability initiatives that enhance profits, there is a growing need for—and interest in—developing a sustain‐centric approach to marketing that relaxes the need to maximize financial well‐being in order to optimize social and ecological well‐being. Even so, because of the dominance of the profit‐centric worldview, hallmarks of sustain‐centric marketing practices remain under‐developed and may even lend themselves to becoming inauthentically mimicked on a piecemeal basis by greenwashing profit‐centric firms. We provide an exploratory empirical study of marketing practices evident in two sustain‐centric firms and draw implications to advance theory for both sustain‐centric and profit‐centric marketing.
Bibliography:The study was approved by the Psychology/Sociology Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba, and used funding from the Norman Frohlich Professorship in Business Sustainability and the F. Ross Johnson Professorship in Marketing.
*
ISSN:0045-3609
1467-8594
DOI:10.1111/basr.12314