Unraveling the Voltage‐Dependent Oxidation Mechanisms of Poly(Ethylene Oxide)‐Based Solid Electrolytes for Solid‐State Batteries

Using galvanostatic techniques, an oxidative stability up to 4.6 V versus Li/Li+ and beyond has been reported for the prototypical polymer electrolyte consisting of 1 m lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). However, no long‐term cycling of a battery with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvanced materials interfaces Vol. 9; no. 8; pp. 2100704 - n/a
Main Authors Seidl, Lukas, Grissa, Rabeb, Zhang, Leiting, Trabesinger, Sigita, Battaglia, Corsin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using galvanostatic techniques, an oxidative stability up to 4.6 V versus Li/Li+ and beyond has been reported for the prototypical polymer electrolyte consisting of 1 m lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). However, no long‐term cycling of a battery with this high cut‐off voltage has been demonstrated. Electrochemical and spectroscopic/spectrometric methods are employed to critically reinvestigate the electrochemical oxidation mechanisms of PEO electrolytes. It is found that the onset of PEO oxidation occurs at much lower voltage of around 3.2 V versus Li/Li+, at which the terminal OH group is deprotonated. At 3.6 V, the chain of the PEO is oxidized. Both processes result in the formation of the strong acid HTFSI, which in turn chemically attacks the PEO to form methanol and 2‐methoxyethanol. A stable cycling of a solid‐state lithium‐metal battery with a high‐energy LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) posititve electrode to an upper cut‐off voltage of 3.6 V versus Li/Li+ is demonstrated, however, resulting in enhanced capacity fading when increasing the upper cut‐off voltage to 3.8 V versus Li/Li+ or higher. Thus, operating PEO electrolytes beyond 3.6 V versus Li/Li+ requires protective layers at the positive electrode‐electrolyte interface to prevent PEO oxidation. The electrochemical oxidation of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)‐based solid electrolytes for Li‐metal batteries is triggered at around 3.2 V, where the terminal OH‐group is oxidized. Around 3.6 V, the polymeric ether‐chain is deprotonated, resulting in the formation of the strong bis(trifluoromethansulfonyl)imide acid (HTFSI). With the breakdown of the ether‐chain, the functionality of the PEO as electrolyte is lost.
ISSN:2196-7350
2196-7350
DOI:10.1002/admi.202100704