The Motivational Effects of Mission Matching: A Lab-Experimental Test of a Moderated Mediation Model

Scholarly literature finds positive motivational effects of matching workers and missions. However, the psychological mechanisms behind this matching effect have not been explored. This article develops and tests a moderated mediation model of mission matching in which meaningfulness serves as an in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic administration review Vol. 76; no. 4; pp. 626 - 637
Main Author Smith, Jason
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2016
American Society for Public Administration
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Scholarly literature finds positive motivational effects of matching workers and missions. However, the psychological mechanisms behind this matching effect have not been explored. This article develops and tests a moderated mediation model of mission matching in which meaningfulness serves as an intervening mechanism that explains the association between mission matching and effort. It also considers how individual differences in prosocial motivation influence the intervening role of meaningfulness. Using a real-effort laboratory experiment with monetary incentives, the article shows that matched subjects exert more effort than mismatched subjects, that this effect is mediated by increases in meaningfulness, that prosociality moderates the effect of a match on meaningfulness, and that the indirect effect of a match on effort through increases in meaningfulness varies as a function of prosociality. These results contribute to a more nuanced understanding of mission matching and suggest that matching may be particularly important for certain types of workers.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-5B2XPCXQ-8
ArticleID:PUAR12514
istex:2F0B7918130B9F57075835C42D95C307B9D4AF07
The Department of Public Administration and International Affairs and the Center for Technology and Information Policy at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs both provided generous funding for this project.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0033-3352
1540-6210
DOI:10.1111/puar.12514