Can rewards induce corresponding forms of theft? Introducing the reward‐theft parity effect

• Published in: Business ethics (Oxford, England) Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 846 - 858
• Main Authors: Johnson, Jeff S., Friend, Scott B., Esteky, Sina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2022
• Subjects: Behavior; Between-subjects design; employee theft; Ethics; mixed methods; Mixed methods research; organizational rewards; Procedural justice; processing fluency; Reinforcement; Rewards; Theft
• ISSN: 2694-6416; 2694-6424
• DOI: 10.1111/beer.12433

Rewards are reinforcement mechanisms that organizations use to shape desirable employee behaviors. However, rewards may also have unintended consequences, such as building expectations for receiving extra benefits and weakening employee barriers to unethical acts. This article investigates the dark side of the reward–behavior association, and exploring what is referred to as the reward–theft parity effect (RTPE). The authors hypothesize that receiving rewards induces a corresponding type of theft. In Study 1, survey results (n = 634) show initial support for the RTPE between rewards and same‐category theft, and that perceptions of procedural justice attenuate this association. Study 2 involved a 2 (reward) × 2 (theft opportunity) between‐subjects experimental design (n = 300) and provides further support for the RTPE by revealing greater theft under a reward–theft parity condition than under a reward–theft disparity condition. Study 3 replicates these findings in a field experiment (n = 285) and finds that the RTPE is exacerbated when the reward–behavior task is perceived as unjust. Collectively, these findings provide new theoretical insights while also giving managers a more complete understanding of the dark side of behavioral reinforcement mechanisms.