Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?

Background We investigated whether microvascular enhancement on contrast‐enhanced sonographic (CEUS) imaging can aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions and correlated these findings with histopathological findings. Method Fifteen patients with a palpable breast mass were recruite...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical ultrasound Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 177 - 181
Main Authors Sorelli, P. G., Cosgrove, D. O., Svensson, W. E., Zaman, N., Satchithananda, K., Barrett, N. K., Lim, A. K. P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.05.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background We investigated whether microvascular enhancement on contrast‐enhanced sonographic (CEUS) imaging can aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions and correlated these findings with histopathological findings. Method Fifteen patients with a palpable breast mass were recruited. Following informed consent, 4.8 mL of the microbubble contrast agent SonoVue was injected intravenously. Digital video clips of lesion enhancement were obtained and reviewed by a consultant radiologist who scored each lesion on the following characteristics: homogeneous versus heterogeneous enhancement, the presence or absence of focal defects, well‐ versus ill‐defined margins and vascular morphology score (VMS). Result Histologically there were 7 malignant and 8 benign lesions. The calculated sensitivity for CEUS in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100%, with a 37.5% specificity. There was no statistically significant difference in overall mean VMS between the malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion The results of our study have not shown any additional benefit in the use of CEUS over conventional triple assessment. The positive trend seen in the higher mean VMS for the malignant tumors needs further investigation with a larger cohort of patients. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2010
Bibliography:ArticleID:JCU20671
istex:77F939C8DD73FE92115DD0022638859CC195CB8C
ark:/67375/WNG-9W5LH729-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0091-2751
1097-0096
1097-0096
DOI:10.1002/jcu.20671