Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession

•Dynamical electron diffraction complicates electromagnetic field mapping via DPC.•Diffraction artefacts from sample bending & thickness variation studied in simulation.•Effects most pronounced in thick (several 10s to 100s of nanometers) samples.•A metric is introduced for the scale of these di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltramicroscopy Vol. 219; p. 113097
Main Authors Mawson, T., Nakamura, A., Petersen, T.C., Shibata, N., Sasaki, H., Paganin, D.M., Morgan, M.J., Findlay, S.D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Dynamical electron diffraction complicates electromagnetic field mapping via DPC.•Diffraction artefacts from sample bending & thickness variation studied in simulation.•Effects most pronounced in thick (several 10s to 100s of nanometers) samples.•A metric is introduced for the scale of these diffraction artefacts.•Precession by a few milliradian can suppress such artefacts by an order of magnitude. It is well known that dynamical diffraction varies with changes in sample thickness and local crystal orientation (due to sample bending). In differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy (DPC-STEM), this can produce contrast comparable to that arising from the long-range electromagnetic fields probed by this technique. Through simulation we explore the scale of these dynamical diffraction artefacts and introduce a metric for the magnitude of their contribution to the contrast. We show that precession over an angular range of a few milliradian can suppress this contribution to the contrast by one-to-two orders of magnitude. Our exploration centres around a case study of GaAs near the [011] zone-axis orientation using a probe-forming aperture semiangle on the order of 0.1 mrad at 300 keV, but the trends found and methodology used are expected to apply more generally.
ISSN:0304-3991
1879-2723
DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113097