Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

• Published in: Journal of thoracic disease Vol. 9; no. Suppl 7; pp. S569 - S574
• Main Authors: Santana, Orlando, Xydas, Steve, Williams, Roy F, LaPietra, Angelo, Mawad, Maurice, Rosen, Gerald P, Beohar, Nirat, Mihos, Christos G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: China AME Publishing Company 01.06.2017
• Subjects: Original; percutaneous coronary intervention; aortic valve replacement; minimally invasive surgery; Coronary artery disease; aortic valve disease
• ISSN: 2072-1439; 2077-6624
• DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.28

In patients requiring coronary revascularization and aortic valve replacement, a combined approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement may be a viable treatment strategy. The outcomes of 123 consecutive patients with significant coronary artery and aortic valve disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention followed by elective minimally invasive aortic valve replacement between February 2009 and April 2014, were retrospectively evaluated. The cohort consisted of 80 males and 43 females, with a mean age of 75.7±8.1 years. Drug-eluting stents were used in 69.9% of the patients, and 64.2% were on dual anti-platelet therapy at the time of aortic valve replacement. Within a median of 39 days (IQR 21-64), 83.7% of the patients underwent primary and 16.3% underwent re-operative minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Post-operatively, there was 1 (0.8%) cerebrovascular accident, 1 patient (0.8%) required a re-operation due to bleeding, and 2 (1.6%) developed acute kidney injury. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients. Follow-up was available for all of the patients, and at a mean follow-up period of 14.3±12.5 months, 4 (3.3%) had an acute coronary syndrome, and 1 (0.8%) required a repeat target vessel revascularization. The actuarial survival rate at 1- and 3-year was 92.7% and 89.4%, respectively. In a select group of patients with coronary artery and aortic valve disease, a combined approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement can be safely performed with excellent short-term and midterm outcomes.