Evaluation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with a Gleason score of 6 in transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy

We aimed to evaluate prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings of patients with a Gleason score (GS) of 6 and effectiveness of MRI based on the final pathology result in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). mpMRI findings of 80 patients who had a GS of 3 + 3 and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolish journal of radiology Vol. 86; pp. e608 - 613
Main Authors Emekli, Emre, Gündoğdu, Elif, Özen, Ata
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Poland Termedia Publishing House 2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We aimed to evaluate prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings of patients with a Gleason score (GS) of 6 and effectiveness of MRI based on the final pathology result in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). mpMRI findings of 80 patients who had a GS of 3 + 3 and who underwent mpMRI were evaluated retrospectively. The mpMRI were scored according to the PIRADS v2.1 guidelines. The patients were divided into those with a high probability of clinically significant cancer (CSC) (PI-RADS 4-5) and those with a low probability of CSC (PI-RADS 2-3). Of the 80 patients, 33.8% had PI-RADS 2-3, and 66.2% had PI-RADS 4-5 lesions. There was a significant difference between the groups in prostate specific antigen (PSA) value, PSA density, patient age, and tumour percentage on biopsy. When the pathology results were taken as the gold standard in the group that underwent RP, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of mpMRI were calculated as 94.74%, 100%, and 96.3%, respectively, an increase in the final GS was found in 9 (33.3%) of the 27 patients, and 70.35% of patients were identified as having CSC. PI-RADS 4-5 scores have high sensitivity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of CSC. mpMRI is a reliable and non-invasive diagnostic method that can complement biopsy results in decision-making in patients who are initially evaluated as low risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Study design
Statistical analysis
Data collection
Manuscript preparation
Literature search
Funds collection
Data interpretation
ISSN:1733-134X
1899-0967
1899-0967
DOI:10.5114/pjr.2021.111082