Temporary Disenfranchisement: Negative Side Effects of Lowering the Voting Age

How does losing one’s right to vote again after having been eligible to vote before affect political fundamentals such as political efficacy? We draw attention to the hitherto neglected phenomenon “temporary disenfranchisement,” which, for instance, occurs regularly in states that extended the franc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American political science review Vol. 117; no. 1; pp. 355 - 361
Main Authors LEININGER, ARNDT, SOHNIUS, MARIE-LOU, FAAS, THORSTEN, ROẞTEUTSCHER, SIGRID, SCHÄFER, ARMIN
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:How does losing one’s right to vote again after having been eligible to vote before affect political fundamentals such as political efficacy? We draw attention to the hitherto neglected phenomenon “temporary disenfranchisement,” which, for instance, occurs regularly in states that extended the franchise to underage citizens in some but not all elections. If an election with voting age 16 is closely followed by an election with voting age 18, underage voters who are eligible for the former will have no right to vote in the latter. Using original panel data on young citizens in Germany and a differences-in-differences design, we find that temporary disenfranchisement results in a decrease in external efficacy, which remains even after regaining eligibility. Our findings highlight an important side effect of selective voting rights extensions and bear insights that are relevant to other cases of temporary disenfranchisement due to residential mobility, citizenship, or felony disenfranchisement.
ISSN:0003-0554
1537-5943
DOI:10.1017/S000305542200034X