Human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells in peripheral nerve regeneration

Peripheral nerve injury can occur as a result of trauma or disease and carries significant morbidity including sensory and motor loss. The body has limited ability for nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Left untreated, nerve lesions can cause lifelong disability. Traditional treatment optio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of stem cells Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 288 - 302
Main Authors Bojanic, Christine, To, Kendrick, Zhang, Bridget, Mak, Christopher, Khan, Wasim S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 26.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Peripheral nerve injury can occur as a result of trauma or disease and carries significant morbidity including sensory and motor loss. The body has limited ability for nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Left untreated, nerve lesions can cause lifelong disability. Traditional treatment options such as neurorrhaphy and neurolysis have high failure rates. Surgical reconstruction with autograft carries donor site morbidity and often provide suboptimal results. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known to have promising regenerative potential and have gained attention as a treatment option for nerve lesions. It is however, unclear whether it can be effectively used for nerve regeneration. To evaluate the evidence for the use of human umbilical cord derived MSCs (UCMSCs) in peripheral nerve regeneration. We carried out a systematic literature review in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. A literature search was performed from conception to September 2019 using PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. The results of eligible studies were appraised. A risk of bias analysis was carried out using Cochrane's RoB 2.0 tool. Fourteen studies were included in this review. A total of 279 subjects, including both human and animal were treated with UCMSCs. Four studies obtained UCMSCs from a third-party source and the remainder were harvested by the investigators. Out of the 14 studies, thirteen conducted xenogenic transplantation into nerve injury models. All studies reported significant improvement in nerve regeneration in the UCMSC treated groups compared with the various different controls and untreated groups. The evidence summarised in this PRISMA systematic review of i studies supports the notion that human UCMSC transplantation is an effective treatment option for peripheral nerve injury.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: To K and Khan WS undertook conception and design of the study; Bojanic C wrote the manuscript under the guidance of To K and Khan WS; Zhang B and Mak C conducted risk of bias analysis; all authors reviewed, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author: Wasim S Khan, CCST, FRCS (Ed), FRCS (Hon), MBChB, MSc, PhD, Lecturer, Surgeon, Division of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. wasimkhan@doctors.org.uk
ISSN:1948-0210
1948-0210
DOI:10.4252/wjsc.v12.i4.288