Pretreatment biopsy for histological diagnosis and induction therapy in thymic tumors

This study was to investigate the value of pretreatment biopsy for histological diagnosis and induction therapies in the management of locally advanced thymic malignancies. The clinical pathological data of patients with thymic tumors in the Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART) who unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thoracic disease Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 656 - 664
Main Authors Yue, Jie, Gu, Zhitao, Yu, Zhentao, Zhang, Hongdian, Ma, Zhao, Liu, Yuan, Fang, Wentao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China AME Publishing Company 01.04.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was to investigate the value of pretreatment biopsy for histological diagnosis and induction therapies in the management of locally advanced thymic malignancies. The clinical pathological data of patients with thymic tumors in the Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART) who underwent biopsy before treatment from 1994 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The application trend of preoperative histological diagnosis and its influence on treatment outcome were analyzed. Of 1,902 cases of thymic tumors, 336 (17.1%) had undergone biopsy for histological diagnosis before therapeutic decision was decided. In recent years, percentage of pretreatment histological diagnosis significantly increased in the later ten years than the former during the study period (P=0.008). There was also a significant increase in thoracoscopy/mediastinoscopy/E-BUS biopsy as compared to open biopsy (P=0.029). Survival in Patients with preoperative biopsy for histology had significantly higher stage lesions (P=0.000) and higher grade malignancy (P=0.000), thus a significantly lower complete resection rate (P=0.000) and therefore a significantly worse survival than those without preoperative biopsy (P=0.000). In the biopsied 336 patients, those who received upfront surgery had significantly better survival than those received surgery after induction therapy (P=0.000). In stage III and IVa diseases, the R0 resection rate after induction therapies increased significantly as compared to the surgery upfront cases (65.5% vs. 46.2%, P=0.025). Tumors downstaged after induction had similar outcomes as those having upfront surgery (92.3% vs. 84.2%, P=0.51). However, tumors not downstaged by induction had significantly worse prognosis than those downstaged (P=0.004), and fared even worse than those having definitive chemoradiation without surgery (37.2% vs. 62.4%, P=0.216). It is crucial to get histological diagnosis for thymoma before surgery or adjuvant treatment and minimally invasive biopsy should be undertaken. Although in our study we could not find the benefit of induction chemotherapy before surgery in survival and recurrence rate, it could increase the R0 resection rate compared with direct surgery in late stage (III and IVa).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Z Yu, W Fang; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Members of ChART; (IV) Collection ad assembly of data: J Yue, H Zhang, Z Ma, Z Gu; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: J Yue, Z Gu, Y Liu; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
ISSN:2072-1439
2077-6624
DOI:10.21037/jtd.2016.03.04