Kinetic behaviour of sodium and boron in brackish water membranes

▶ Study of the behavior of boron rejection brackish water reverse osmosis membranes. ▶ Kinetic behavior of the brackish water membranes. To reduce the boron concentration in desalinated water by reverse osmosis (RO) the most used technology is the second RO step. The membranes employed are typical o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of membrane science Vol. 368; no. 1-2; pp. 86 - 94
Main Authors Fernanda Chillón Arias, María, Bru, Laureano Valero i, Rico, Daniel Prats, Galvañ, Pedro Varó
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 15.02.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:▶ Study of the behavior of boron rejection brackish water reverse osmosis membranes. ▶ Kinetic behavior of the brackish water membranes. To reduce the boron concentration in desalinated water by reverse osmosis (RO) the most used technology is the second RO step. The membranes employed are typical of brackish water working at high pH. In this article, the kinetic parameters of transport through the membranes were determined and the influence of pH was studied. A pilot plant fed with desalinated seawater was used. Boron in water is mainly in the form of boric acid in equilibrium with borate. The variations in pH alter the relative proportion of these species. The differences observed in the transport of boron as a function of the pH do not occur solely due to the physical properties of the membrane, but are the result of two interactions: the species present of boron, boric acid borate, and the characteristics of the membrane. The coefficient of reflection of boron and of the permeability of the species has been calculated. The influence of pH on the boric acid–borate equilibrium justifies the marked differences observed in the rejection of boron at high and low pH, while the influence of pH on the values of permeability coefficients and reflection of each species justifies the differences observed between membranes.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.019
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-7388
1873-3123
DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.019