Intimate Entanglements: Affects, more-than-human intimacies and the politics of relations in science and technology

• Published in: The Sociological review (Keele) Vol. 67; no. 2; pp. 247 - 263
• Main Authors: Latimer, Joanna, López Gómez, Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.03.2019; Sage Publications Ltd; The Sociological Review
• Subjects: afecte; afecto; affects; care; ciencia y tecnología; ciència i tecnologia; cuidado; cura; Emotions; Frame analysis; Interpersonal relations; Intimacy; intimidad; intimitat; Politics; Relaciones humanas; Relacions humanes; Science and technology; Sociology of science; Technology; intimacy; affects; Science and Technology Studies; more-than-human; care
• ISSN: 0038-0261; 1467-954X
• DOI: 10.1177/0038026119831623

This article introduces Intimate Entanglements by proposing three interrelated shifts that result from juxtaposing experiences with different world-making practices at the intersection of care, technoscience and theoretical engagements with affect theory and Science and Technology Studies (STS). The first shift positions intimacy as not only relevant in STS but also as a more general epistemic concern of social scientific enquiry. The second shift is an exploration of the heterogeneous materiality of the intimate and, in particular, of its more-than-human constituencies. The third shift both reclaims and speculates about other politics of relations, including practical challenges (not only conceptual) to the way we do research. The article shows that the beings entangled, the materialities involved, the affects conveyed and the extension of the intimate all come to matter when science and technology is critically analysed, and that they challenge the traditional limits and geographies of the intimate. The paper also argues that this has important political implications for science and technology studies. By countering the invisibilisation of ‘intimate work’ through its usual association with the emotional and the domestic, the article contests the ready-made framing of the intimate as bound to the interpersonal, corporal and private. In so doing, the authors make visible the politics of relations that scientific and technological settings silently enact.