Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: A review

• Published in: Food quality and preference Vol. 82; p. 103872
• Main Authors: Stampa, Ekaterina, Schipmann-Schwarze, Christin, Hamm, Ulrich
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2020
• Subjects: Alphabet theory; animal husbandry; animal welfare; Beef; biodiversity; cattle production; consumer attitudes; consumer preferences; ecological footprint; food choices; Grass-fed; livestock products; markets; Milk; Pasture-based; prices; social benefit; terminology; wildlife; Willingness to pay; Pasture-based; Grass-fed; Beef; Willingness to pay; Alphabet theory; Milk
• ISSN: 0950-3293; 1873-6343
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103872

•39 consumer research articles on pasture-raised livestock products were reviewed.•The findings were structured using the Alphabet Theory framework.•Health and animal welfare benefits make pasture-raised products attractive.•Communication of the products’ value for biodiversity conservation is needed.•Research based on real market data is called for. Intensive cattle production is one of the primary causes of biodiversity loss. Pasture-based animal husbandry has the potential to reverse this negative trend. Pasture-raised livestock products represent a premium niche with an extra value through a cleaner environmental footprint and care for animal welfare, including wildlife. This review focuses on recent scientific findings in consumer behavior regarding pasture-raised products. A systematic literature search was conducted in online databases using a fixed search term. Thirty-nine relevant consumer studies published between 2000 and 2019 in the English language were selected for the review. The Alphabet Theory was applied as a theoretical framework to analyze the findings. Consumer behavior regarding pasture-raised products is largely defined through health and environmental attitudes and depends substantially on the context of a purchase decision. There are a variety of consumer groups willing to pay a premium for a pasture-raised attribute even on top of an organic price premium. Consumer knowledge of the subject is rather low and confusion exists regarding the terminology: consumers often mistake the production system behind pasture-raised products for organic or conventional. This calls for communication of the environmental and social benefits of pasture-based production and the importance of individual food choices. This article is the first to review scientific consumer studies on perceptions, preferences, behavior regarding and willingness to pay for pasture-raised products. Further research, especially research based on real market data, is recommended to explore the effect of specific environmental attributes, social and personal norms, informational content, and product types on consumer preferences and willingness to pay for pasture-raised products.