Optimization of antioxidant hydrolysate production from flying squid muscle protein using response surface methodology

► Hydrolysates from flying squid muscle protein exhibit antioxidative potentials. ► We optimize the hydrolysis condition of the protein. ► Reusing flying squid by-products can enhance economical effectiveness. The squid muscle protein, extracted from by-products of flying squid (Ommastrephes bartram...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood and bioproducts processing Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 676 - 682
Main Authors Fang, Xubo, Xie, Ningning, Chen, Xiaoe, Yu, Hui, Chen, Jing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Rugby Elsevier B.V 01.10.2012
Institution of Chemical Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Hydrolysates from flying squid muscle protein exhibit antioxidative potentials. ► We optimize the hydrolysis condition of the protein. ► Reusing flying squid by-products can enhance economical effectiveness. The squid muscle protein, extracted from by-products of flying squid (Ommastrephes bartrami) was hydrolyzed by five proteases (pepsin, trypsin, papain, alcalase and flavourzyme). DPPH radical scavenging power was used to evaluate antioxidative activity of hydrolysates. The hydrolysate obtained by papain exhibited the most excellent potential of antioxidative activity. Furthermore, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize hydrolysis conditions, including enzyme to substrate (E/S) ratio, reaction temperature, and hydrolysis time. The optimum conditions obtained were as follows: E/S ratio of 1.74%, temperature of 51°C and time of 46min, under which, DPPH radical scavenging activity of 74.25% was obtained. Moreover, it was found that the optimum hydrolysate of 8mg/mL displayed relatively stronger inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation compared with α-Tocopherol of 0.1mg/mL.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-3085
1744-3571
DOI:10.1016/j.fbp.2012.04.001