Comparison of doubly labeled water, intake-balance, and direct- and indirect-calorimetry methods for measuring energy expenditure in adult men

Energy expenditure (EE) of four adult men on a weight-maintenance diet was estimated by use of doubly labeled water, intake balance, and direct and indirect calorimetry. The doubly labeled water (2H218O) method was used to estimate free-living EE for 13 d. Metabolizable energy (ME) intake was used t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 66 - 71
Main Authors Seale, JL, Rumpler, WV, Conway, JM, Miles, CW
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 01.07.1990
American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI10.1093/ajcn/52.1.66

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Energy expenditure (EE) of four adult men on a weight-maintenance diet was estimated by use of doubly labeled water, intake balance, and direct and indirect calorimetry. The doubly labeled water (2H218O) method was used to estimate free-living EE for 13 d. Metabolizable energy (ME) intake was used to estimate free-living EE for 1 wk. The subjects’ 24-h EE was measured in a dual direct-indirect room calorimeter on 3 alternate days. Estimates of free-living EE as measured by ME intake and doubly labeled water indicate agreement between the two methods (mean difference +/- SEM, -1.04 +/- 0.63%). Measurements of EE with indirect and direct calorimetry are equivalent (mean difference 0.63 +/- 0.44%). The daily EE measured by doubly labeled water in these free-living adults over a 13-d period was 15.01% greater than the 24-h EE measured within the calorimeter.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
None
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/52.1.66