Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature

• Published in: World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 7; pp. 2256 - 2270
• Main Authors: Tyberg, Amy, Karia, Kunal, Gabr, Moamen, Desai, Amit, Doshi, Rushabh, Gaidhane, Monica, Sharaiha, Reem Z, Kahaleh, Michel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 21.02.2016
• Subjects: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - instrumentation; Debridement - adverse effects; Drainage - adverse effects; Drainage - instrumentation; Drainage - methods; Enteral Nutrition - adverse effects; Humans; Necrosis; Pancreatic Juice - microbiology; Pancreatic Juice - secretion; Pancreatic Pseudocyst - diagnostic imaging; Pancreatic Pseudocyst - microbiology; Pancreatic Pseudocyst - physiopathology; Pancreatic Pseudocyst - therapy; Pancreatitis - diagnostic imaging; Pancreatitis - microbiology; Pancreatitis - physiopathology; Pancreatitis - therapy; Review; Severity of Illness Index; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Pancreatic fluid collection; Walled-off pancreatic necrosis; Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis
• ISSN: 1007-9327; 2219-2840
• DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2256

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct (PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.