Decisional burden among parents of children with cancer

• Published in: Cancer Vol. 125; no. 8; pp. 1365 - 1372
• Main Authors: Sisk, Bryan A., Kang, Tammy I., Goldstein, Richard, DuBois, James M., Mack, Jennifer W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 15.04.2019
• Subjects: Cancer; Child; Children; Clinical decision making; communication; Confidence intervals; Decision making; Decision Making, Shared; ethics; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasms - psychology; Oncology; Parents; Parents & parenting; Parents - psychology; pediatric oncology; Prospective Studies; regret; Roles; shared decision making; Surveys and Questionnaires; shared decision making; pediatric oncology; communication; ethics; regret
• ISSN: 0008-543X; 1097-0142
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31939

Background Despite growing evidence and support for shared decision making, little is known about the experiences of parents who hold more active roles than they wish. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of 372 parents of children with cancer and their oncologists at 2 academic pediatric hospitals. Parents were surveyed within 12 weeks of the diagnosis, and they were assessed for associated factors and outcomes of holding a more active decision‐making role than they preferred. Parents were asked about their preferred and actual roles in decision making. Oncologists were asked to estimate parental preferences. Results Most parents preferred to share decision making with the oncologist (64% [236 of 372]); however, 13% (49 of 372) preferred oncologist‐led decision making. Most parents fulfilled their ideal decision‐making role (66% [244 of 372]), but a notable minority were either more involved (14% [52 of 372]) or less involved than they preferred (20% [76 of 372]; P < .0001 [McNemar test]). Oncologists recognized parents’ preferred roles in 49% of cases (167 of 341); 24% (82 of 341) of parents preferred more active roles than the oncologist recognized, and 27% (92 of 341) preferred less active roles than recognized. No parent or communication characteristics were found that were associated with parents’ holding a more active role than desired in decision making. Parents who held more active roles in decision making than they wished had higher odds of decisional regret (odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.07‐6.80; P < .0001). Conclusions Although many parents fulfill their desired roles in decision making about their child’s cancer, some are asked to take on more active roles than they wish. Holding a more active role than desired may lead to increased decisional regret. This study examines the psychological consequences of holding a more active decision‐making role than desired in pediatric oncology. Decisional burden is associated with increased regret in parents.