Screening for post‐intensive care syndrome: Validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self‐Report Chinese version
Background The Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self‐Report (HABC‐M SR) is a tool to evaluate physical, mental and cognitive impairments. It has been validated in several countries for post‐intensive care syndrome (PICS) assessment, but there is no Chinese version yet. Aim The aim of this study is t...
Saved in:
Published in | Nursing in critical care Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 824 - 829 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2024
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
The Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self‐Report (HABC‐M SR) is a tool to evaluate physical, mental and cognitive impairments. It has been validated in several countries for post‐intensive care syndrome (PICS) assessment, but there is no Chinese version yet.
Aim
The aim of this study is to translate and cross‐cultural adapt HABC‐M SR, and validate its psychological properties among Chinese ICU survivors.
Study Design
This is a cross‐sectional study. the HABC‐M SR was translated into Chinese and validated in intensive care unit survivors (n = 145). Measures of internal consistency, construct validity, concurrent validity, and content validity were evaluated.
Results
A 19‐item Chinese version of HABC‐M SR was yielded, with good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and validity (the variance was 64.4%, overall content validity was 0.91, and correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.90).
Conclusions
The 19‐item Chinese version HABC‐M SR is a reliable and valid tool for PICS assessing and may be regarded as a standard measurement.
Relevance to Clinical Practice
The Chinese version HABC‐M SR may help in selecting PICS high‐risk survivors for ICU follow‐up interventions. The HABC‐M SR can also be regarded as a standard specific PICS measurement, thus promote the comparability between studies and transformation of the clinical evidence. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1362-1017 1478-5153 1478-5153 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nicc.12949 |