Investigating the impact of ‘dark nudges’ on drinking intentions: A between groups, randomized and online experimental study

• Published in: British journal of health psychology Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 272 - 292
• Main Authors: Lewin, Joel, Field, Matt, Davies, Emma
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2024
• Subjects: Alcohol; Alcohol Drinking; alcohol labels; Alcohol use; Alcoholic beverage industry; Between-subjects design; Campaigns; Cancer; Causality; Credibility; dark nudges; Drinking behavior; Ethanol; Frame analysis; Funding; Humans; Individual differences; Intention; Liquor industry; message framing; Neoplasms; Perceptions; prototypes; responsible drinking; Social Norms; Students; Tactics; responsible drinking; alcohol labels; prototypes; credibility; social norms; message framing; dark nudges
• ISSN: 1359-107X; 2044-8287; 2044-8287
• DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12698

Objectives This study explored how ‘dark nudges’ (tactics used in alcohol industry‐funded responsible drinking campaigns) affect drinking intentions, perceived source credibility and whether individual differences in perceptions of prototypical drinkers moderated these effects. Design Two 2 × 2 between‐groups online experimental studies. Methods Study 1 (N = 164) presented three alcohol health messages per condition, comprising social norm (healthy/unhealthy (“dark nudge”)) by frame (loss/gain). Study 2 (N = 229) presented one message per condition, comprising cancer causality (single cause/multiple causes (dark nudge)) by funding disclosure (disclosure/non‐disclosure (dark nudge)). Outcomes were drinking intentions and perceived source credibility. Exploratory analyses considered prototype perceptions as a between‐subjects moderator. Results No significant effects of message frame, social norm, fundi or multiple cancer causality arguments on drinking intentions were found. In Study 2, in the dark nudge multiple cancer causality conditions, perceived source credibility was high when funding was undisclosed, but significantly lower when it was disclosed. Exploratory analyses suggested effects were moderated by prototype similarity. In Study 1, higher perceived similarity to a heavy drinker and lower perceived similarity to a responsible drinker were associated with higher drinking intentions in the unhealthy norm/gain frame condition, but lower drinking intentions in the other conditions. Conclusions Framing, social norm, funding disclosure and multiple causality manipulations as tested in this study did not exert a dark nudge effect on drinking intentions. However, the exploratory analyses suggest it could be hypothesised that the types of messages used in alcohol industry‐funded responsible drinking campaigns may result in greater drinking intentions among those who identify more as heavy drinkers and less as responsible drinkers. Perceived prototype similarity may be an important moderator of the impact of alcohol health messages that warrants further research. Study 2 suggests disclosure of industry funding guides judgements of the credibility of sources of misleading messages about alcohol and cancer.