Development of a new analgesic index using nasal photoplethysmography

• Published in: Anaesthesia Vol. 73; no. 9; pp. 1123 - 1130
• Main Authors: Choi, B. M., Park, C., Lee, Y. H., Shin, H., Lee, S. H., Jeong, S., Noh, G. J., Lee, B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2018
• Subjects: Accuracy; Analgesics; Anesthesia; Commercialization; Feasibility studies; Health care; Mathematical models; Model accuracy; nasal; Pain; Patients; plethysmography; Septum; Surgery; nasal; plethysmography; analgesics
• ISSN: 0003-2409; 1365-2044
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.14327

Summary Although surrogate measures to quantify pain intensity have been commercialised, there is a need to develop a new index with improved accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop a new analgesic index using nasal photoplethysmography data. The specially designed sensor was placed between the columella and the nasal septum to acquire nasal photoplethysmography in surgical patients. Nasal photoplethysmography and Surgical Pleth Index® (GE Healthcare) data were obtained for 14 min both in the absence (pre‐operatively) or presence (postoperatively) of pain in a group of surgical patients, each patient acting as their own control. Various dynamic photoplethysmography variables were extracted to quantify pain intensity; the most accurate index was selected using logistic regression as a classifier. The area under the curve of the receiver‐operating characteristic curve was measured to evaluate the accuracy of final model predictions. In total, 12,012 heart beats from 89 patients were used to develop a new Nasal Photoplethysmography Index for analgesic depth quantification. The two‐variable model (a combination of diastolic peak point variation and heart beat interval variation) was most accurate in discriminating between the presence and absence of pain (numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 3). The accuracy and area under the curve of the receiver‐operating characteristic curve for the Nasal Photoplethysmography Index were 75.3% and 0.8018, respectively, and 64.8% and 0.7034, respectively, for the Surgical Pleth Index. The Nasal Photoplethysmography Index clearly distinguished pain (NRS ≥ 3) in awake surgical patients with postoperative pain. The Nasal Photoplethysmography Index performed better than the Surgical Pleth Index. Further validation studies are needed to evaluate its feasibility to quantify pain intensity during general anaesthesia.