Dimensional ridge changes in conjunction with four implant timing protocols and two types of soft tissue grafts: A pilot pre‐clinical study

• Published in: Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 401 - 411
• Main Authors: Lee, Kwang‐Seok, Shin, Seung‐Yun, Hämmerle, Christoph H. F., Jung, Ui‐Won, Lim, Hyun‐Chang, Thoma, Daniel S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2022
• Subjects: Alveolar Process - surgery; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods; Alveoli; Animals; Collagen; Collagen - therapeutic use; Connective Tissue - transplantation; connective tissue graft; Dogs; implant placement; Premolars; Skin & tissue grafts; tissue remodelling; Tooth Extraction; Tooth Root; Tooth Socket - surgery; volume‐stable cross‐linked collagen matrix; implant placement; tissue remodelling; volume-stable cross-linked collagen matrix; connective tissue graft
• ISSN: 0303-6979; 1600-051X
• DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13594

Aim To determine the effect of (1) implant placement timing and (2) the type of soft tissue graft in terms of ridge profile changes. Materials and Methods Four implant treatment modalities were applied in the mesial root areas of the third and fourth mandibular premolars of 10 mongrel dogs alongside connective‐tissue graft (CTG) and volume‐stable cross‐linked collagen matrix (VCMX): immediate, early, and delayed placement (DP), and DP following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). All dogs were sacrificed 3 months after soft tissue augmentation. Standard Tessellation Language files from designated time points were analysed. Results Compared with the pre‐extraction situation, the median width of the ridge demontstrated a linear increase only in group ARP/CTG (0.07 mm at the 2‐mm level), whereas all other groups showed a reduction (between −1.87 and −0.09 mm, p > .05). Groups ARP/CTG (0.17 mm) and DP/CTG (0.05 mm) exhibited a profilometric tissue gain in a set region of interest (p > .05). The net effect of CTG and VCMX ranged from 0.14 to 0.79 mm. Conclusions Dimensional ridge changes varied between treatment protocols. ARP with CTG led to the smallest difference in ridge profile between the pre‐extraction and the study end time point. Both CTG and VCMX enhanced the ridge contour.