Non‐invasive continuous arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation measured with Nexfin® in patients following major upper abdominal surgery: a comparative study

• Published in: Anaesthesia Vol. 71; no. 7; pp. 788 - 797
• Main Authors: Wilde, R. B. P., Wit, F., Geerts, B. F., Vliet, A. L., Aarts, L. P. H. J., Vuyk, J., Jansen, J. R. C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2016
• Subjects: Abdominal surgery; Anesthesia; arterial blood pressure; monitoring; pulse pressure variation; monitoring; pulse pressure variation; arterial blood pressure
• ISSN: 0003-2409; 1365-2044
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.13503

Summary We compared the accuracy and precision of the non‐invasive Nexfin® device for determining systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation, with arterial blood pressure values measured from a radial artery catheter in 19 patients following upper abdominal surgery. Measurements were taken at baseline and following fluid loading. Pooled data results of the arterial blood pressures showed no difference between the two measurement modalities. Bland–Altman analysis of pulse pressure variation showed significant differences between values obtained from the radial artery catheter and Nexfin finger cuff technology (mean (SD) 1.49 (2.09)%, p < 0.001, coefficient of variation 24%, limits of agreement −2.71% to 5.69%). The effect of volume expansion on pulse pressure variation was identical between methods (concordance correlation coefficient 0.848). We consider the Nexfin monitor system to be acceptable for use in patients after major upper abdominal surgery without major cardiovascular compromise or haemodynamic support.