Memory, Narrative, and the Consequences

Drawing on papers from three different areas — evolutionary psychology, developmental psychology, sociolinguistics analysis — this commentary states that there is by now an empirically grounded and theoretically reflected memory research that has begun to break with the traditional individual‐centri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTopics in cognitive science Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 821 - 824
Main Author Brockmeier, Jens
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Drawing on papers from three different areas — evolutionary psychology, developmental psychology, sociolinguistics analysis — this commentary states that there is by now an empirically grounded and theoretically reflected memory research that has begun to break with the traditional individual‐centric orientation of the memory sciences. This break, it is argued, is the consequence of a new interest in the dialectics between memory and language, between social (or collective or collaborative) remembering and narrative. On this view, memory is taken less as a substance and more as a set of practices, of intersubjective and interpretive acts of a remembering subject. Brockmeier reflects on the positive consequences (e.g., socio‐cultural socialization of children) of examining conversational remembering as a process or practice that is context‐dependent and functionally oriented, relying on the interplay of narrative, cognitive and cultural resources co‐evolving over multiple time‐scales rather than just a substance or product located in people’s brains.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Commentary-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1756-8757
1756-8765
1756-8765
DOI:10.1111/tops.12412