Patient and carer experience of living with a pressure injury: A meta‐synthesis of qualitative studies

• Published in: Journal of clinical nursing Vol. 32; no. 13-14; pp. 3233 - 3247
• Main Authors: Burston, Adam, Miles, Sandra J., Fulbrook, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2023
• Subjects: Caregivers; decubitus ulcer; Disease management; meta‐synthesis; patient care; Patients; pressure injury; pressure sore; pressure ulcer; Pressure ulcers; Qualitative research; Quality of life; systematic review; Wound healing; pressure injury; decubitus ulcer; meta-synthesis; patient care; pressure sore; systematic review; pressure ulcer
• ISSN: 0962-1067; 1365-2702
• DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16431

Introduction Pressure injuries are a significant cause of harm, contributing to increased mortality and financial burden on the healthcare system. Significant research on pressure injury risk assessment, prevention and treatment exists, but limited research exploring the patient and carer experience of living with pressure injury. Aims The aim of this meta‐synthesis was to describe the patient and carer experience of living with a pressure injury. Design Meta‐synthesis. Methods A prospective review protocol was registered, and systematic search conducted across five electronic databases. The PRISMA 2020 checklist for reporting systematic reviews was used. Two reviewers independently undertook screening and review of articles, using the CASP checklist for evaluating qualitative research. A meta‐synthesis using thematic content analysis was undertaken. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐synthesis led to the construction of three primary themes: loss of autonomy and independence, psychological effects, and adjustment. Within these primary themes, sub‐themes of dependence, social isolation and social avoidance behaviours, feelings and emotions, loss, managing, physical consequences, service provision, and functional challenges, were identified. Conclusion The psychology and mindset of those involved, and support to navigate the challenges that arise are two unique and clinically relevant categorisations to guide provision of pressure injury care. Adaptation to a pressure injury is multi‐faceted and contextual, challenges to adaptation create additional psychological burden. Interventions encompassing all facets of the experience are necessary. Current research into experiences is limited, and further research to support interventions is necessary.