Lessons on the Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Conquest, Commerce, and Decline in Enlightenment Italy
Though the theme of his Sigwick Memorial Lecture at Cambridge was "Decadence," and though he knew that "somewhere in the dim future" decline lay inevitably ahead, former British prime minister Arthur Balfour saw in 1908 "no symptoms either of pause or of regression in the on...
Saved in:
Published in | The American historical review Vol. 115; no. 5; pp. 1395 - 1425 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
The University of Chicago Press
01.12.2010
University of Chicago Press Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Though the theme of his Sigwick Memorial Lecture at Cambridge was "Decadence," and though he knew that "somewhere in the dim future" decline lay inevitably ahead, former British prime minister Arthur Balfour saw in 1908 "no symptoms either of pause or of regression in the onward movement which for more than a thousand years has been characteristic of Western civilization." Just over a century later, his "dim future" has become our grim present. With the relative decline of the West upon us, historians have an important role to play in supplying the perspectives necessary to make sense of changing circumstances. It might aid us in this process to revisit the debate embedded in the political economy of Enlightenment Italy, which was almost certainly the most advanced debate on decline in the history of the West. Because, uniquely, Italy had twice declined from a hegemonic position: once through conquest, with the barbarian invasions that toppled Rome's Western Empire; and once through commerce, with the economic competition from territorial monarchies that signaled the end of the Italian Renaissance. These two catastrophes provided theorists there with unique insights into the nature of decline and inspired ceaseless (though now little-known) debate about the means of overcoming it. As a guide through these uncharted and often melancholy lands, people can look to the nearly forgotten poet Agostino Paradisi (1736-1783) of Modena, the peninsula's third professor of political economy and one of his century's most acute theorists of decline. Our poet presents us with an ideal case study for rethinking not only the political economy of decline, but the very nature of Enlightenment itself. Here, Reinert takes on the conventional claim that the Enlightenment mainstream put its faith in peaceful laissez-faire economics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Sophus A. Reinert received his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 2009, and is currently a Research Fellow in History at Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge. His research and publications focus on intellectual and economic history since the Renaissance. His first book, tentatively titled “Translating Empire: Emulation and the Origins of Political Economy,” is forthcoming with Harvard University Press and explores the codification of political economy in the Enlightenment world through the translation of economic works and the exigencies of international competition at the time. I would like to thank Robert Fredona, Istvan Hont, Jacob Soll, Anoush F. Terjanian, and particularly Francesca L. Viano for their comments on earlier versions, as well as Robert A. Schneider and the anonymous reviewers for the American Historical Review for their incisive critiques. Jane Lyle has been an extraordinary copyeditor. istex:610E5B5364B62EC0CC5F3FD97F805FC01255AB60 ark:/67375/HXZ-N515G6KD-S href:115-5-1395.pdf ArticleID:AHRahr.115.5.1395 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-8762 1937-5239 |
DOI: | 10.1086/ahr.115.5.1395 |