Kinetics of oxidation of total sulfite in the ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization process

Using bubbling apparatus, the kinetics of oxidation of total sulfite in ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process was investigated by varying concentrations of SO 3 2− and SO 4 2−, pH, temperatures and air flow. The concentration range of sulfite is 0.0044–0.026 gmol L −1 and that of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Vol. 164; no. 1; pp. 132 - 138
Main Authors Jia, Yong, Zhong, Qin, Fan, Xueyou, Wang, Xinrong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier B.V 15.10.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using bubbling apparatus, the kinetics of oxidation of total sulfite in ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process was investigated by varying concentrations of SO 3 2− and SO 4 2−, pH, temperatures and air flow. The concentration range of sulfite is 0.0044–0.026 gmol L −1 and that of sulfate is 0.5–2 gmol L −1. Experiments were conducted at pH level of 4.5–6.5 and air flow ranging from 50 to 200 L h −1. In the temperature range of 303.15–333.15 K, the reaction was found to be −0.5 order with respect to sulfite. The experimental findings also showed that the bisulfite could be oxidized easier than sulfite. Thus, keeping the pH level of the solution low is conducive to the oxidation of total sulfite. The apparent activation energy for the overall oxidation was calculated to be 28.0 kJ mol −1. A kinetic model has been derived according to the experimental results. The developed kinetic model, including the operating parameters SO 3 2− concentration, SO 4 2− concentration, pH, temperature and air flow, can be applied to simulate the oxidation of total sulfite. This model would be useful for the design of the ammonia-based wet FGD system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1385-8947
1873-3212
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.041