A comparison of the shuttle and 6 minute walking tests with measured peak oxygen consumption in patients with heart failure

This study investigated the use of an incremental, externally-paced 10m shuttle walk test (SWT) as an objective, reliable and predictive test of functional capacity in patients with heart failure (CHF). The SWT was compared to a 6 minute walk test (6WT) and a maximal symptom-limited treadmill peak o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of science and medicine in sport Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 292 - 300
Main Authors Green, D.J., Watts, K, Rankin, S, Wong, P, O'Driscoll, J.G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated the use of an incremental, externally-paced 10m shuttle walk test (SWT) as an objective, reliable and predictive test of functional capacity in patients with heart failure (CHF). The SWT was compared to a 6 minute walk test (6WT) and a maximal symptom-limited treadmill peak oxygen consumption (V̇O 2peak) test. Experiment 1 examined the reproducibility of the SWT. Two SWT trials were performed and distance ambulated (DA), heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) results compared. In experiment 2, SWT, 6WT, and V̇O 2peak tests were performed and HR, RPE and ambulatory V̇O 2 compared. The SWT demonstrated strong test/retest reliability for DA (r = 0.98), HR (r = 0.96) and RPE (r = 0.89). Treadmill V̇O 2peak was significantly correlated with DA during the SWT (r = 0.83, P < 0.05), but not the 6WT. SWT peak V̇O 2 (18.5±1.8 ml.kg −1.min −1) and treadmill V̇O 2peak (18.3±2.0 ml.kg −1.min −1) were also highly correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.05). Conversely, 6WT peak V̇O 2 and treadmill V̇O 2peak were not significantly correlated. This study suggests the SWT is a reliable, objective test, highly predictive of V̇O 2peak which may be a more optimal field exercise test than the self paced 6WT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1440-2440
1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80038-4