Comparison of SPF10 real-time PCR and conventional PCR in combination with the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus in cervical samples

•Simultaneous amplification and detection of HPV target by a SPF10 real-time PCR.•Reduction of workload and cost by avoiding LiPA step for HPV-negative samples.•Assessment of the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR using cervical samples.•High comparability between SPF10 real-time PCR and convent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of virological methods Vol. 194; no. 1-2; pp. 113 - 117
Main Authors Micalessi, M.I., Boulet, G.A., Pillet, S., Jacquet, J., Pozzetto, B., Bogers, J.J., Bourlet, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Simultaneous amplification and detection of HPV target by a SPF10 real-time PCR.•Reduction of workload and cost by avoiding LiPA step for HPV-negative samples.•Assessment of the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR using cervical samples.•High comparability between SPF10 real-time PCR and conventional PCR. The novel SPF10 real-time PCR assay allows the simultaneous amplification and detection of the HPV target. That way, LiPA analysis of the HPV-negative samples can be avoided, reducing workload and cost. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR in combination with the LiPA assay for HPV detection and typing in cervical samples. Thirty-nine cervical samples were subjected to the SPF10 conventional PCR in combination with the LiPA assay. Subsequently, the SPF10 real-time PCR was performed to enable the comparison between the SPF10 conventional and the real-time PCR results. In case of discrepancy, the samples were subjected to the CLART® HPV2 assay. As a result, 27 out of 39 samples were identified as HPV-positive by the SPF10 real-time PCR and were genotyped further by the LiPA assay. Twenty samples (74.1%) showed an absolute agreement between the conventional and real-time SPF10 PCR (concordant), three (11.1%) displayed additional or fewer types (compatible), two (7.4%) did not show any similarity between both assays (discordant) and the remaining two (7.4%) were LiPA-negative. The two assays showed an excellent strength of agreement for individual (κ=0.932) and multiple genotype detection (κ=0.834). In conclusion, the two SPF10 PCR methods are comparable. Therefore, the SPF10 real-time PCR with subsequent LiPA could be used for the detection and genotyping of HPV in cervical samples.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.013
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.013