Comparison of SPF10 real-time PCR and conventional PCR in combination with the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus in cervical samples
•Simultaneous amplification and detection of HPV target by a SPF10 real-time PCR.•Reduction of workload and cost by avoiding LiPA step for HPV-negative samples.•Assessment of the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR using cervical samples.•High comparability between SPF10 real-time PCR and convent...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of virological methods Vol. 194; no. 1-2; pp. 113 - 117 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.12.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Simultaneous amplification and detection of HPV target by a SPF10 real-time PCR.•Reduction of workload and cost by avoiding LiPA step for HPV-negative samples.•Assessment of the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR using cervical samples.•High comparability between SPF10 real-time PCR and conventional PCR.
The novel SPF10 real-time PCR assay allows the simultaneous amplification and detection of the HPV target. That way, LiPA analysis of the HPV-negative samples can be avoided, reducing workload and cost.
This study aims to evaluate the performance of the SPF10 real-time PCR in combination with the LiPA assay for HPV detection and typing in cervical samples. Thirty-nine cervical samples were subjected to the SPF10 conventional PCR in combination with the LiPA assay. Subsequently, the SPF10 real-time PCR was performed to enable the comparison between the SPF10 conventional and the real-time PCR results. In case of discrepancy, the samples were subjected to the CLART® HPV2 assay. As a result, 27 out of 39 samples were identified as HPV-positive by the SPF10 real-time PCR and were genotyped further by the LiPA assay. Twenty samples (74.1%) showed an absolute agreement between the conventional and real-time SPF10 PCR (concordant), three (11.1%) displayed additional or fewer types (compatible), two (7.4%) did not show any similarity between both assays (discordant) and the remaining two (7.4%) were LiPA-negative. The two assays showed an excellent strength of agreement for individual (κ=0.932) and multiple genotype detection (κ=0.834).
In conclusion, the two SPF10 PCR methods are comparable. Therefore, the SPF10 real-time PCR with subsequent LiPA could be used for the detection and genotyping of HPV in cervical samples. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.013 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0166-0934 1879-0984 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.013 |