Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core
Statement of Problem: Although bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 83; no. 6; pp. 644 - 647 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Mosby, Inc
01.06.2000
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Statement of Problem: Although bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials.
Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent.
Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil Photobond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear bond strengths.
Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV).
Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a successful bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70063-1 |