Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core

Statement of Problem: Although bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 83; no. 6; pp. 644 - 647
Main Authors Madani, Mehdi, Chu, Frederick C.S., McDonald, Ailbhe V., Smales, Roger J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.06.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Statement of Problem: Although bonding to all-ceramic restorations is desirable, there is little information on the use of resin cements containing a phosphate monomer, and the importance of different surface treatments on their adhesion to high-strength core materials. Purpose: This study attempted to determine the shear bond strength values between Panavia 21 resin cement (Kuraray) and an alumina core material (In-Ceram) after 3 surface treatments and the application of a silane coupling agent. Material and Methods: Forty-five In-Ceram cylindrical rods were fabricated and assigned to 3 groups. Group I specimens were treated with a 9.5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, group II with a 5% HF acid, and group III were sandblasted. All specimens were coated with a silane coupling agent (Cavex Clearfil Photobond and Activator) before cementation with Panavia 21 to sandblasted nickel-chromium rods. As a control, group IV consisted of 8 porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) rods treated with a 5% HF acid and silane. All specimens were subjected to a load of 1.2 kg during cementation, then stored under water for 36 hours. A jig mounted on a Hounsfield Universal Testing machine was used at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to test the shear bond strengths. Results: The results were 14.65 ± 4.64 MPa for group I, 18.03 ± 6.13 MPa for group II, and 22.35 ± 5.98 MPa for group III In-Ceram specimens; and 18.05 ± 8.46 MPa for control (group IV). Conclusion: The use of Panavia 21 resin cement and a silane coupling agent can achieve a successful bond between either sandblasted or 5% HF acid-etched In-Ceram core material. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-7.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70063-1