Making blood ‘Melanesian’: Fieldwork and isolating techniques in genetic epidemiology (1963–1976)

‘Isolated’ populations did not exist unproblematically for life scientists to study. This article examines the practical and conceptual labour, and the historical contingencies that rendered populations legible as ‘isolates’ for population geneticists. Though a standard historiographical narrative t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences Vol. 47; pp. 118 - 129
Main Author Widmer, Alexandra
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:‘Isolated’ populations did not exist unproblematically for life scientists to study. This article examines the practical and conceptual labour, and the historical contingencies that rendered populations legible as ‘isolates’ for population geneticists. Though a standard historiographical narrative tells us that population geneticists were moving from typological understandings of biological variation to processual ones, cultural variation was understood as vulnerable to homogenisation. I chart the importance that D. Carleton Gajdusek placed on isolates from his promotion of genetic epidemiology in WHO technical reports and at a Cold Spring Harbour symposium to his fieldwork routines and collection practices in a group of South Pacific islands. His fieldwork techniques combined social, cultural and historical knowledge of the research subjects in order to isolate biological descent using genealogies. Having isolated a population, Gajdusek incorporated biological materials derived from that population into broad categories of ‘Melanesian’ and ‘race’ to generate statements about the genetics of abnormal haemoglobins and malaria. Alongside an analysis of Gajdusek's practices, I present different narratives of descent, kinship and identities learned during my ethnographic work in Vanuatu. These alternatives show tacit decisions made pertaining to scale in the production of ‘isolates’. •Human biological variation was seen as an evolutionary process best studied in ‘primitive isolates’.•Human cultural variation was viewed as vulnerable to homogenisation.•D. Carleton Gajdusek's fieldwork reveals how he isolated populations.•Producing ‘isolates’ meant tacit decisions on scales of identity and history.•To isolate populations, genetic epidemiologists employed static concepts of culture.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Biography-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1369-8486
1879-2499
1879-2499
DOI:10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.05.012