Conventional and high order sliding mode control

Term “Conventional” sliding mode control (SMC) was introduced in the book Sliding Mode Control and Observation [1] by the authors, working in the area of high order sliding mode (HOSM) control. The term is related to all publications on n-dimensional systems with m- dimensional control and with slid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Franklin Institute Vol. 357; no. 15; pp. 10244 - 10261
Main Authors Utkin, Vadim, Poznyak, Alex, Orlov, Yury, Polyakov, Andrey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elmsford Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2020
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Term “Conventional” sliding mode control (SMC) was introduced in the book Sliding Mode Control and Observation [1] by the authors, working in the area of high order sliding mode (HOSM) control. The term is related to all publications on n-dimensional systems with m- dimensional control and with sliding modes and state trajectories in a manifold of order n-m. Most of publications on HOSM control studied a new phenomenon for systems with a scalar control (m = 1), specifically, the existence of sliding modes in manifolds of dimension lower than n-1 with a finite reaching time. Along with implementation issues, it was natural to discuss to what extent the main principles of the conventional theory were to be revised (definitions, existence conditions, motion equations), what new properties of systems with HOSM can be expected. Partially these questions were discussed in [2] along with several international workshops on SMC and CDC in 2018. In this paper we demonstrate that main concepts are similar for both types of SMC, discuss new developments needed for HOSM control, compare the potential to suppress chattering, complexity of the both methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0016-0032
1879-2693
0016-0032
DOI:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.06.018