Creating Constitutional Conservatism

• Published in: Polity Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 387 - 413
• Main Author: Lienesch, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Palgrave Macmillan 01.07.2016; Palgrave Macmillan UK; The University of Chicago Press; University of Chicago Press
• Subjects: 20th century; Activism; Conservatism; Constitutional law; Equal rights; Historians; Immigration; International Relations; Networks; Nominations; Political activism; Political parties; Political Science; Political Science and International Relations; Political Science and International Studies; Political scientists; Political Theory; Politics; Scientists; US Politics; Writers; North Carolina; New York; Washington DC; United States > US; Baltimore Maryland; American Constitution; Progressivism; constitutional conservatism; conservatism
• ISSN: 0032-3497; 1744-1684
• DOI: 10.1057/pol.2016.10

Although “constitutional conservatism” has become commonplace among American conservatives, its meaning has proven elusive. Revisionist historians and political scientists have looked to its origins in the early twentieth century, when Republican Party elites constructed a conservative interpretation of the Constitution and put it into practice in the era of Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover. Yet these revisionists have told only part of the story, because constitutional conservatism was also the creation of a network of activists and groups who in the 1920s constructed a nationwide campaign to instill a conservative understanding of the Constitution in the American public. This study examines how they built their campaign, defined its purpose, framed a conservative reading of constitutional history and theory, and conveyed it to the public in a bitterly contested political process. By telling this fuller story, it provides a more complete understanding of constitutional conservatism, both in the past and today.