Size and velocity-dispersion evolution of early-type galaxies in a Λ cold dark matter universe
Early-type galaxies (ETGs) are observed to be more compact at z≳ 2 than in the local Universe. Remarkably, much of this size evolution appears to take place in a short ∼1.8 Gyr time span between z∼ 2.2 and 1.3, which poses a serious challenge to hierarchical galaxy formation models where mergers occ...
Saved in:
Published in | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 422; no. 2; pp. 1714 - 1731 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Early-type galaxies (ETGs) are observed to be more compact at z≳ 2 than in the local Universe. Remarkably, much of this size evolution appears to take place in a short ∼1.8 Gyr time span between z∼ 2.2 and 1.3, which poses a serious challenge to hierarchical galaxy formation models where mergers occurring on a similar time-scale are the main mechanism for galaxy growth. We compute the merger-driven redshift evolution of stellar mass
, half-mass radius
and velocity dispersion
predicted by concordance Λ cold dark matter for a typical massive ETG in the redshift range z∼ 1.3-2.2. Neglecting dissipative processes, and thus maximizing evolution in surface density, we find −1.5 ≲a
M
≲−0.6, −1.9 ≲a
R
≲−0.7 and 0.06 ≲a
σ≲ 0.22, under the assumption that the accreted satellites are spheroids. It follows that the predicted z∼ 2.2 progenitors of z∼ 1.3 ETGs are significantly less compact (on average a factor of ∼2 larger R
e at given M
*) than the quiescent galaxies observed at z≳ 2. Furthermore, we find that the scatter introduced in the size-mass correlation by the predicted merger-driven growth is difficult to reconcile with the tightness of the observed scaling law. We conclude that - barring unknown systematics or selection biases in the current measurements - minor and major mergers with spheroids are not sufficient to explain the observed size growth of ETGs within the standard model. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20749.x |