Microbiota in Wheat Roots, Rhizosphere and Soil in Crops Grown in Organic and Other Production Systems

Culturable microbial communities and diseases were compared in organic, integrated and conventional systems of winter wheat production and monoculture. Particular emphasis was placed on the density and diversity of cereal pathogens and their potential antagonists, and on the association of the activ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of phytopathology Vol. 163; no. 4; pp. 245 - 263
Main Authors Lenc, Leszek, Kwaśna, Hanna, Sadowski, Czesław, Grabowski, Andrzej
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin Parey 01.04.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Culturable microbial communities and diseases were compared in organic, integrated and conventional systems of winter wheat production and monoculture. Particular emphasis was placed on the density and diversity of cereal pathogens and their potential antagonists, and on the association of the active microbial populations with the health and productivity of wheat. In roots, rhizoplane and rhizosphere, fungi tended to be most abundant in the integrated system or monoculture, and bacteria in the organic system. The dominant fungal groups (with individual frequency >5%) included root pathogens (Fusarium, Gibberella, Haematonectria and Ilyonectria) and known pathogen antagonists (Acremonium strictum, Clonostachys, Chaetomium, Gliocladium and Trichoderma spp.). The 50 subdominant species (with individual frequency 1–5%) included the pathogens Alternaria, Cladosporium (leaf spot), Gaeumannomyces graminis (take‐all), Glomerella graminicola (anthracnose), Oculimacula yallundae (eyespot), Phoma spp. (leaf spots), and Pythium and Rhizoctonia (root rot). The 40 subrecedent species (with individual frequency <1%) included minor pathogens (Botrytis, Coniothyrium, Leptosphaeria). Antagonists in roots, rhizoplane and rhizosphere were most frequent in the organic system and least frequent in monoculture, suggesting that these systems had the most and least disease‐suppressive habitats, respectively. The other two systems were intermediate, with microbial communities suggesting that the conventional system produced a slightly more suppressive environment than the integrated system. The highest grain yield, in the integrated system, was associated with high abundance of fungi, including fungal pathogens, lowest abundance of Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas and Streptomyces in roots, rhizoplane and soil, and relatively high stem‐base and leaf disease severity. The lowest grain yields, in the organic system and monoculture, were associated with less abundant fungi and more abundant Pseudomonas. There is no clear indication that yields were affected by diseases.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jph.12313
Figure S1. Location of the experimental fields at Osiny: fields 1 - 5 under organic system, 6 - 8 under conventional system , 9 - 12 under integrated system, 13 - under monoculture. Wheat cultivated in 2005 - on fields 4, 8, 11 and 13, in 2006 - on fields 2, 7, 12 and 13, in 2007 - on fields 3, 6, 9 and 13.Table S1. Characteristics of soils at Osiny in 2005-2007.Table S2. Crop management procedures used in different systems of wheat production.
ArticleID:JPH12313
istex:AF1B8F229A1F57DEAE26031F15AC14CFA89D4C31
ark:/67375/WNG-DXZKMTRX-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-1785
1439-0434
DOI:10.1111/jph.12313