Do patients trust computers?

In two studies, we inquired whether patients accept medical recommendations that come from a computer program rather than from a physician. In study 1, we found that subjects, when deciding whether to have an operation or not in different medical scenarios, were more likely to follow a recommendatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of behavioral decision making Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 455 - 468
Main Authors Promberger, Marianne, Baron, Jonathan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.12.2006
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In two studies, we inquired whether patients accept medical recommendations that come from a computer program rather than from a physician. In study 1, we found that subjects, when deciding whether to have an operation or not in different medical scenarios, were more likely to follow a recommendation that came from a physician than one that came from a computer program. Subjects stated that they would feel less responsible when following a recommendation than when deciding against it. Following a physician's recommendation reduced the feeling of responsibility more than following that of a computer program. The difference in feeling of responsibility when following versus when not following a recommendation partly mediated subjects' inclination to follow the physician more. In our second study, we found that subjects were more decision seeking when they received a recommendation or decision from a computer program, and they were more decision seeking when they had to accept a decision than when they received a recommendation. Subjects also trusted the physician more than the computer program to make a good recommendation or decision. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:7E7A411E48CD56E7CB3B84A5619455F9540308AB
ArticleID:BDM542
Russell Sage Foundation
ark:/67375/WNG-2F13V45J-6
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0894-3257
1099-0771
DOI:10.1002/bdm.542