Steps, Stages, and Structure: Finding Compensatory Order in Scientific Theories

Stage theories are prominent and controversial in science. One possible reason for their appeal is that they provide order and predictability. Participants in Experiment 1 rated stage theories as more orderly and predictable (but less credible) than continuum theories. In Experiments 2-5, we showed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental psychology. General Vol. 142; no. 2; pp. 313 - 318
Main Authors Rutjens, Bastiaan T, van Harreveld, Frenk, van der Pligt, Joop, Kreemers, Loes M, Noordewier, Marret K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Psychological Association 01.05.2013
Subjects
Alzheimers Disease
Attention
Developmental Stages
Female
Grief
Humans
Locus of Control
Male
Moral Development
Pattern Recognition
Prediction
Probability
Role
Science
Serial Ordering
Theories
Thinking
Young Adult
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Stage theories are prominent and controversial in science. One possible reason for their appeal is that they provide order and predictability. Participants in Experiment 1 rated stage theories as more orderly and predictable (but less credible) than continuum theories. In Experiments 2-5, we showed that order threats increase the appeal of stage theories of grief (Experiment 2) and moral development (Experiments 4 and 5). Experiment 3 yielded similar results for a stage theory on Alzheimer's disease characterized by predictable decline, suggesting that preference for stage theories is independent of valence. Experiment 4 showed that the effect of threat on theory preference was mediated by the motivated perception of order, and Experiment 5 revealed that it is particularly the fixed order of stages that increases their appeal. (Contains 4 tables and 6 footnotes.)
ISSN:0096-3445
1939-2222
DOI:10.1037/a0028716