ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL APPROACH FOR CLIVAL CHORDOMAS

• Published in: Neurosurgery Vol. 64; no. 2; pp. 268 - 278
• Main Authors: Stippler, Martina, Gardner, Paul A., Snyderman, Carl H., Carrau, Ricardo L., Prevedello, Daniel M., Kassam, Amin B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.02.2009; Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Chordoma - mortality; Chordoma - surgery; Cranial Fossa, Posterior - surgery; Endoscopy; Endoscopy - methods; Endoscopy - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Cavity - surgery; Patients; Pennsylvania - epidemiology; Skull Neoplasms - mortality; Skull Neoplasms - surgery; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Systematic review; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Pennsylvania; Cranial base surgery; Chordoma; Expanded endonasal approach; Clivus; Skull base surgery; Endoscopic
• ISSN: 0148-396X; 1524-4040
• DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338071.01241.E2

Abstract OBJECTIVE Cranial base chordomas are difficult lesions to treat. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) takes advantage of the natural sinus corridor and may provide a less invasive approach for these midline tumors. METHODS Patients undergoing EEA for chordomas were selected from a database of more than 800 consecutive patients undergoing EEA at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and were retrospectively evaluated. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature of endoscopic endonasally resected chordomas was performed and compared with our personal experience. RESULTS Twenty patients (8 females and 12 males) underwent 26 endoscopic EEAs for cranial base chordomas. Eight chordomas (40%) were recurrent. Treatment of the 12 newly diagnosed chordomas included 8 total resections (66.7%), 2 near total resections (16.7%), and 2 subtotal resections (16.7%). Treatment of the 8 recurrent chordomas included 1 gross total resection (12.5%), 2 near total resections (25.0%), and 5 subtotal resections (62.5%). Two patients (10%) had recurrences, and 5 patients (25%) progressed during the mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 1–45 months). Five patients (25%) underwent re-resection, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died secondary to progression of disease. There was 1 intraoperative vascular complication with no sequelae. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 25%, and there were no cases of bacterial meningitis. The incidence of a new permanent neurological complication was 5%. A systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 26 cases of chordomas resected via a completely endoscopic endonasal technique. CONCLUSION Endoscopic endonasal resection of cranial base chordomas is safe once adequate experience is gained with the technique. This approach provides the potential for, at the least, similar resections compared with traditional cranial base approaches while potentially limiting morbidity.