Diving into Batch-to-Batch Variability of Topical Products-a Regulatory Bottleneck

• Published in: Pharmaceutical research Vol. 37; no. 11; p. 218
• Main Authors: Miranda, Margarida, Cova, Tânia, Augusto, Cátia, Pais, Alberto A. C. C., Cardoso, Catarina, Vitorino, Carla
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.11.2020; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biochemistry; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Generic drugs; Medical Law; Multivariate analysis; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Pharmacy; Research Paper; Rheology; Statistical analysis; EMA; batch variability; topical products; Rheology; IVRT
• ISSN: 0724-8741; 1573-904X
• DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02911-y

Purpose Following the recent European Medicine Agency (EMA) draft guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products, a modular framework for bioequivalence assessment is proposed, wherein the qualitative, quantitative, microstructure and product performance sameness is demanded to support generic applications. Strict regulatory limits are now imposed, but, the suitability of these limits has been subject of intense debate. In this context, this paper aims to address these issues by characterizing a panel of 8 reference blockbuster semisolid topical products. Methods For each product, three batches were selected and, whenever possible, batches retrieved from different manufacturing sites were considered. Product microstructure was evaluated in terms of globule size, pH, rheological attributes and, if required, the thermal behaviour was also assessed. Performance was evaluated through in vitro release testing (IVRT). Finally, an integrated multivariate analysis was performed to highlight the features that most contribute for product variability. Results Marked differences were registered within reference products. Statistical analysis demonstrated that if EMA criteria are applied, none of the same product batches can be considered as equivalent. Rheological parameters as well as IVRT indicators account for the majority of batch-to-batch differences. Conclusions Semisolid dosage forms exhibit intrinsic variability. This calls for the attention to the need of establishing reasonable equivalence criteria applied to generic drug products. Graphical abstract