The effect of a motor relearning on balance and postural control in patients after stroke: An open-label randomized controlled trial

Introduction: Balance and postural control impairments are common in stroke patients, increasing fall risk and limiting their daily and social activities. Current research lacks comprehensive studies evaluating the efficacy and long-term effects of task-specific training on balance and postural cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean stroke journal Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 303 - 311
Main Authors Ghrouz, Amer, Guillen-Sola, Anna, Morgado-Perez, Andrea, Muñoz-Redondo, Elena, Ramírez-Fuentes, Cindry, Curbelo Peña, Yulibeth, Duarte, Esther
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: Balance and postural control impairments are common in stroke patients, increasing fall risk and limiting their daily and social activities. Current research lacks comprehensive studies evaluating the efficacy and long-term effects of task-specific training on balance and postural control among stroke patients, especially when considering biomechanical and posturographic assessments. Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled trial included 63 subacute stroke patients recruited from the outpatient rehabilitation department. Participants were randomly assigned to the MRP group (n=32), receiving task-specific training based on MRP, or the CPT group (n=31), receiving conventional physical therapy. Both groups completed an 8-week intervention (3 sessions/week; 1 h./session). Balance and postural control were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and posturography. Results: The MRP group exhibited significantly larger improvements than the CPT group in both BBS scores (p=0.001, d=2.98, 95% CI [2.25, 3.70]) and Balance Index scores (p=0.001, d=2.83, 95% CI [2.12, 3.53]) after the intervention. These improvements were sustained at 3-month follow-up. Discussion: The findings suggest that task-specific training based on MRP is more effective than CPT for improving balance and postural control. The MRP intervention may enhance the motor learning and neural plasticity of the patients, leading to better functional outcomes. However, the study’s open-label design represents a limitation, and further research with adequate blinding is needed. Conclusion: Task-specific training based on MRP was superior to CPT for improving balance and postural control in subacute stroke patients. Participants undergoing MRP exhibited significant and clinically relevant improvements that were sustained at follow-up. Graphical abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:2396-9873
2396-9881
2396-9881
DOI:10.1177/23969873231220218