Adjusted chi-square statistics: application to clustered binary data in primary care

The frequency of randomized cluster trials is increasing in primary care research. These trials are differentiated by the randomization method, in which a group of individuals is randomly assigned to an intervention as a cluster rather than as individuals. Characteristically, individuals within a cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of family medicine Vol. 2; no. 3; pp. 201 - 203
Main Author Reed, 3rd, James F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Copyright 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc 01.05.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The frequency of randomized cluster trials is increasing in primary care research. These trials are differentiated by the randomization method, in which a group of individuals is randomly assigned to an intervention as a cluster rather than as individuals. Characteristically, individuals within a cluster tend to be more alike than individuals selected at random. For instance, evaluating the effect of an intervention across medical care providers at an institutional level or at a physician group practice level fits the randomized cluster model. Three examples in this article show how failure to account for the dependence introduced by unit of randomization can affect the analysis of binary data and the conclusions of randomized cluster trials. Greater consideration of the nested nature of patient, physician, and practice data would increase the quality of primary care research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: James F. Reed III, PhD, Research Institute, St. Luke’s Hospital and Health Network, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015, ReedJ@slhn.org
Conflicts of interest: none reported
ISSN:1544-1709
1544-1717
DOI:10.1370/afm.41