Effect on endometrial histology and pharmacokinetics of different dose regimens of progesterone vaginal pessaries, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Which progesterone vaginal pessary dose regimen induces adequate secretory transformation of the endometrium, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo? SUMMARY ANSWER The best secretory transformation of the endometrium was observed during treatment with 400 mg...
Saved in:
Published in | Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 2131 - 2140 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
01.11.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Which progesterone vaginal pessary dose regimen induces adequate secretory transformation of the endometrium, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo?
SUMMARY ANSWER
The best secretory transformation of the endometrium was observed during treatment with 400 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries, administered twice daily.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Vaginally administered progesterone is widely used for luteal phase support (LPS) in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Although several vaginal formulations using various doses are available, little is known on the impact of formulation and doses at the endometrial level.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
The study had a randomised, observer-blind design and comprised two parts. The participants used study medication during two or three treatment periods, separated by washout periods. Subjects in Part 1 (n = 61 treated) received 200 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries twice daily (bid), 400 mg pessaries bid and the comparator 90 mg progesterone vaginal gel once daily (od) in a 3-way crossover design. Subjects in Part 2 (n = 64 treated) received 100 mg pessaries bid in one period and 400 mg pessaries od in the other period in a 2-way crossover design. A subgroup of these subjects (n = 22 treated) received placebo vaginal pessaries bid in a third period in a non-randomised manner. The study was performed from May 2012 until April 2013.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
The study was performed at a clinical research centre in healthy female volunteers of reproductive age. The subjects used 2 mg estradiol bid for 24 days in each treatment cycle. Progesterone or placebo was administered vaginally from Day 15 onwards during 10 days. In each treatment period, an endometrial biopsy for histological evaluation was performed on Day 23 and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the first progesterone dose on Day 15 and after the last dose on Day 24.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Frequencies of (early and late) secretory transformation of the endometrium, i.e. adequate responses, during treatment with 200 mg and 400 mg vaginal pessaries bid were comparable with those during 90 mg vaginal gel treatment (90-94%), whereas lower secretory transformation rates were observed during treatment with 100 mg bid and 400 mg od (64-75%). At the time of the endometrial biopsy in the cycle the late secretory state of the endometrium, which is characteristic of adequate luteal support, was observed more often with 400 mg pessaries bid (90%) than with vaginal gel (82%) and with lower pessary doses (64-78%). Pharmacokinetic parameters after repeated dosing of vaginal pessaries showed a dose-dependent, but not dose-proportional, increase of plasma progesterone levels. The lowest incidence of bleeding and spotting was reported during treatment with 400 mg pessaries bid.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION
The primary outcome parameter, rate of secretory transformation of the endometrium, is a surrogate for endometrial receptivity and for the actual clinical efficacy.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Delivery of progestesterone through 400 mg pessaries bid is an effective alternative method for luteal support in ART.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The study was funded by Actavis Group PTC ehf., Iceland, part of Teva Pharmaceuticals, and L.D. Collins. I.D. and C.K. are directors of Dinox, a contract research organisation. I.K. is Managing Director of Pharmaplex and M.W. is Managing Director of M.A.R.C.O., service organisations involved in organisation/supervision and evaluation/reporting of clinical trials. All received funding for the conduct of the study from Actavis. S.H. and Th.M. are employees of Actavis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
EudraCT number 2012-001726-95 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/dey288 |