An inhibition effect in the temporal constrains of attentional selection: The Backward Blink

The study aims at investigating the dynamics of visual information processing during sequential control of attentional selection. By combining two different traditional paradigms we show for the first time that during rapid selection of visual targets, encoding of a new target stimulus is facilitate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa psychologica Vol. 139; no. 3; pp. 501 - 506
Main Authors Sdoia, Stefano, Ferlazzo, Fabio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.03.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The study aims at investigating the dynamics of visual information processing during sequential control of attentional selection. By combining two different traditional paradigms we show for the first time that during rapid selection of visual targets, encoding of a new target stimulus is facilitated by suppression of the preceding relevant stimulus category (Backward Blink; BB). Such inhibition would operate to reduce interference from previously stored information, in order to facilitate the instantiation of a new attentional episode. Results suggest that the same underlying inhibitory mechanism might contribute to two different attentional effects, specifically, the switch cost and the Attentional Blink, suggesting a general inhibitory mechanism of attentional control, with broad implications for understanding how the brain perceives any task-relevant stimulus. ► Combined Task-inhibition and Rapid-Serial-Visual-Presentation procedure. ► Report of 3 targets (T) among distractors in ABA or CBA target category sequence. ► Larger T3-Attentional Blink on ABA vs CBA due to residual T1-category inhibition. ► Attentional set inhibition supports rapid reengagement of attention to new items.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6918
1873-6297
DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.005