"Fighting Fire with Fire": Rethinking the Role of Disgust in Hate Crimes
How should communities respond to crimes expressing hate, not merely toward an individual victim, but also toward the larger group of which that victim is part? This question is not new: it has been framed, domestically, by the emergence and flourishing of identity politics; it has been underscored,...
Saved in:
Published in | California law review Vol. 90; no. 5; pp. 1423 - 1464 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berkeley CA United States of America
School of Law, University of California, Berkeley
01.10.2002
California Law Review Inc University of California - Berkeley, School of Law |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | How should communities respond to crimes expressing hate, not merely toward an individual victim, but also toward the larger group of which that victim is part? This question is not new: it has been framed, domestically, by the emergence and flourishing of identity politics; it has been underscored, beyond U.S. borders, by efforts to address war crimes and genocide born of group-based antagonisms. But the tragedies of September 11, 2001, have framed this question with distinctive urgency. Fierce hatreds fueled the attacks themselves. These acts then triggered a wave of violence against Arab Americans, Muslims, and others assumed to be of Middle Eastern origin. Though this wave appears to have crested, its virulence and possible repetition compel us to think anew about the most fruitful responses to group-based hatred in our communities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Informit, Melbourne (Vic) California Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 5, Oct 2002, 1423-1464 |
ISSN: | 0008-1221 1942-6542 |
DOI: | 10.2307/3481361 |