Late pacemaker requirement after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation may predict the presence of transplant coronary artery disease

• Published in: The Journal of heart and lung transplantation Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 67 - 71
• Main Authors: Cannon, Bryan C, Denfield, Susan W, Friedman, Richard A, Fenrich, Arnold L, Dreyer, W.Jeffrey, Towbin, Jeffrey A, Kertesz, Naomi J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2004; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Bradycardia - diagnosis; Bradycardia - prevention & control; Cardiology. Vascular system; Child; Child, Preschool; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis; Coronary Artery Disease - prevention & control; Coronary heart disease; Heart; Heart Transplantation - methods; Humans; Infant; Medical sciences; Pacemaker, Artificial; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Human; Heart; Graft(material); Pediatrics; Late; Instrumentation therapy; Cardiovascular disease; Infant; Homotransplantation; Coronary heart disease; Instrumental stimulation; Requirement; Orthotopic transplantation; Pacemaker; Surgery; Graft; Circulatory system; Child
• ISSN: 1053-2498; 1557-3117
• DOI: 10.1016/S1053-2498(03)00058-5

Background: Few data are available regarding pacemaker implantation after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, indications and associations with regard to pacemaker placement in children who have undergone orthotopic heart transplantation. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution from October 1984 to March 2001. Data obtained included demographics, indications for pacemaker, presence of transplant coronary artery disease and long-term follow-up. Patients were divided into: Group 1, patients requiring a pacemaker within 3 months of transplantation; and Group 2, patients requiring a pacemaker beyond 3 months. Results: Pacemakers were required in 7 of 106 (6.6%) transplant recipients. Pacing indications for patients in Group 1 ( n = 2) were persistent bradycardia with pause-related ventricular arrhythmia and atrial flutter with resultant sinus pauses of up to 4 seconds. In Group 2 patients ( n = 5), indications for pacing were high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block in 1 patient and episodic sinus pauses up to 3.3 seconds associated with syncope/dizziness in the remaining 4 patients. All patients in Group 2 had transplant coronary disease diagnosed within 1 year of pacemaker implantation. All had resolution of symptoms and no complications after implantation. Conclusions: Pacemakers are infrequently required after cardiac transplantation in children. Despite not meeting classic symptomatic sinus bradycardia criteria, pacemaker placement should be considered post-transplantation in patients with episodic sinus pauses and dizziness or syncope. Patients who present with the aforementioned symptoms or high-grade AV block should be evaluated closely for the presence or development of transplant coronary artery disease, as it may be their first symptom.