Gap structure and establishment of Silver birch regeneration ( Betula pendula Roth.) in Norway spruce stands ( Picea abies L. Karst.)
To describe the characteristics of gaps in Picea abies L. (Karst.) stands (>80 years) and gain an understanding of their effects and importance for natural regeneration of Silver birch ( Betula pendula Roth.), seven even-aged spruce stands were investigated. Regeneration of Birch was analysed for...
Saved in:
Published in | Forest ecology and management Vol. 229; no. 1; pp. 314 - 324 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.07.2006
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To describe the characteristics of gaps in
Picea abies L. (Karst.) stands (>80 years) and gain an understanding of their effects and importance for natural regeneration of Silver birch (
Betula pendula Roth.), seven even-aged spruce stands were investigated. Regeneration of Birch was analysed for 495 gaps, which were sampled by the line intersect method.
A gap was defined as expanded gap, which includes the ground area under a canopy opening extending to the bases of canopy trees surrounding that opening [
sensu Runkle, J.R., 1981. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology 62 (4), 1041–1051].
The gap size ranged from 21 to 2157
m
2, with a median of 75
m
2. Fraction of land area in gaps was between 7 and 11% of total stand area according to evaluation method. Most of Silver birch seedlings surveyed had an age between 2 and 4 years. Significant differences (
P
≤
0.05) in growth reaction caused by gap size were observed. Seedlings were most common and grew faster in larger gaps (>50
m
2), but they were rare in gaps >1000
m
2, because of the increased competition of grass. Analyses of field vegetation/substrate were included and it was obvious that Silver birch seedlings were more abundant in needle litter and mosses, although the most wide-spread vegetation group was grass. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.010 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.010 |