Molecular mass characterization of polymers with strongly interacting groups using gel permeation chromatography–light scattering detection

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 976; no. 1; pp. 155 - 164
• Main Authors: Blagodatskikh, I.V, Sutkevich, M.V, Sitnikova, N.L, Churochkina, N.A, Pryakhina, T.A, Philippova, O.E, Khokhlov, A.R
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English; Russian
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 08.11.2002; Elsevier
• Subjects: Acrylic Resins - chemistry; Chromatography, Gel - methods; Ionomers; Light; Molecular Weight; Polymers; Scattering, Radiation; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Detection, LC; Polymers; Molecular mass; Ionomers
• ISSN: 0021-9673
• DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01145-7

This work is aimed at studying dilute solution behavior and developing techniques for the proper M r characterization of polymers with strongly interacting groups. In particular, we have studied ionomers based on poly(dimethylcarbosiloxane) with carboxylic groups and hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide and its charged terpolymer. Gel permeation chromatography–light scattering (GPC–LS) study of organosilicon ionomers allowed us to follow molecular mass distribution evolutions during approximately a week that evidenced the gradual dissolution of clusters formed in bulk polymers. The rate of this process depends on the polymer composition and its preliminary treatment. Observed aggregates are found to be stable during the procedure of chromatographic analysis. For characterization of hydrophobically modified polyacrylamide and its charged derivatives, we have used aqueous NaNO 3–acetonitrile mixed solvent. Fluorescence spectroscopy with pyrene as a probe did not reveal any hydrophobic association in this solvent in contrast to aqueous solutions. Reversed-phase retention as well as polyelectrolyte exclusion were suppressed at GPC analysis. GPC–LC and classical LS methods gave consistent results for uncharged and weakly charged polymers. In the case of highly charged and highly hydrophobic terpolymers LS results evidenced association, while GPC–LC gave credible M r values. We can conclude that in the last case, the observed association was weak enough to be disrupted in the coarse of chromatography.