Single Postoperative Instillation of Gemcitabine in Patients with Non-muscle-invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Multicentre Study

Abstract Background Recurrence prophylaxis with intravesical gemcitabine (GEM) was effective and safe in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); efficacy as single-shot instillation remains to be proved. Objective To compare the efficacy of a single GEM instillation versus placebo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean urology Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 495 - 503
Main Authors Böhle, Andreas, Leyh, Herbert, Frei, Christian, Kühn, Michael, Tschada, Reinhold, Pottek, Tobias, Wagner, Walter, Knispel, Helmut H, von Pokrzywnitzki, Wolfgang, Zorlu, Ferruh, Helsberg, Karin, Lübben, Birgit, Soldatenkova, Victoria, Stoffregen, Clemens, Büttner, Hartwig
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier 01.09.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Recurrence prophylaxis with intravesical gemcitabine (GEM) was effective and safe in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); efficacy as single-shot instillation remains to be proved. Objective To compare the efficacy of a single GEM instillation versus placebo (PBO) immediately after transurethral resection (TUR) of tumour in patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC (pTa/pT1,G1–3). Design, setting, and participants This was a double-blind, randomised, PBO-controlled study in patients with clinical evidence of primary or recurrent NMIBC (Ta/T1,G1–3). Of 355 patients randomised at 24 urologic centres, 328 underwent TUR and received instillation (92.4%; GEM/PBO: 166/162). In case of nonmalignancy, carcinoma in situ (CIS), ≥pT2 disease, or intraoperative complications, patients were discontinued. Intervention We used a single, postoperative 30–40-min instillation of GEM (2000 mg/100 ml of saline) or PBO (100 ml of saline) followed by continuous bladder irrigation for ≥20 h. A second TUR (no instillation) and adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations were allowed. Measurements Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included type of recurrence and adverse events. To detect a difference in RFS, 191 recurrences were required (80% power, log-rank-test, α = 0.050). Results and limitations Two hundred forty-eight patients (69.9%, GEM, PBO: 124, 124) had histologically confirmed pTa/pT1 G1–3 Gx tumour and were eligible for efficacy (GEM: 76.6% male; median age: 65 yr; PBO: 83.1% male; median age: 67 yr). Treatment groups were balanced (pTa: 75.0%, 71.0%; G1–G2: 85.5%, 87.9%; recurrent tumour: 24.2%, 21.0%; BCG: 10.5%, 16.9%). After a median follow-up of 24 mo, there were only 94 recurrences and 11 deaths. The study was terminated early based on predefined decision criteria. RFS was high in both groups (12-mo RFS [95% confidence interval (CI)]: GEM: 77.7% [68.8–84.3]; PBO: 75.3% [66.3–82.3]). There was no significant group difference (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.946 [0.64–1.39], log-rank test, p = 0.777). Conclusions In this study of NMIBC, the immediate single instillation of GEM 2000 mg/100 ml of saline after TUR was not superior to PBO in terms of RFS. Rigid continuous irrigation and improved TUR/cystoscopy techniques may have contributed to the high RFS in both groups.
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.010