Optimal Base Wavelet Selection for ECG Noise Reduction Using a Comprehensive Entropy Criterion

• Published in: Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 17; no. 9; pp. 6093 - 6109
• Main Authors: He, Hong, Tan, Yonghong, Wang, Yuexia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2015
• Subjects: base wavelet; Criteria; Entropy; Entropy (Information); Filtering; Filtration; optimal selection; Optimization; Roots; thresholding filtering; Wavelet
• ISSN: 1099-4300; 1099-4300
• DOI: 10.3390/e17096093

The selection of an appropriate wavelet is an essential issue that should be addressed in the wavelet-based filtering of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Since entropy can measure the features of uncertainty associated with the ECG signal, a novel comprehensive entropy criterion Ecom based on multiple criteria related to entropy and energy is proposed in this paper to search for an optimal base wavelet for a specific ECG signal. Taking account of the decomposition capability of wavelets and the similarity in information between the decomposed coefficients and the analyzed signal, the proposed Ecom criterion integrates eight criteria, i.e., energy, entropy, energy-to-entropy ratio, joint entropy, conditional entropy, mutual information, relative entropy, as well as comparison information entropy for optimal wavelet selection. The experimental validation is conducted on the basis of ECG signals of sixteen subjects selected from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. The Ecom is compared with each of these eight criteria through four filtering performance indexes, i.e., output signal to noise ratio (SNRo), root mean square error (RMSE), percent root mean-square difference (PRD) and correlation coefficients. The filtering results of ninety-six ECG signals contaminated by noise have verified that Ecom has outperformed the other eight criteria in the selection of best base wavelets for ECG signal filtering. The wavelet identified by the Ecom has achieved the best filtering performance than the other comparative criteria. A hypothesis test also validates that SNRo, RMSE, PRD and correlation coefficients of Ecom are significantly different from those of the shape-matched approach (α = 0.05 , two-sided t- test).