Usefulness and limitations of various guinea-pig test methods in detecting human skin sensitizers—Validation of guinea-pig tests for skin hypersensitivity

Several guinea-pig predictive test methods were evaluated by comparison of results with those obtained with human predictive tests, using ten compounds that have been used in cosmetics. The method involves the statistical analysis of the frequency with which guinea-pig tests agree with the findings...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood and chemical toxicology Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 67 - 74
Main Authors Marzulli, F., Maguire, H.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.1982
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several guinea-pig predictive test methods were evaluated by comparison of results with those obtained with human predictive tests, using ten compounds that have been used in cosmetics. The method involves the statistical analysis of the frequency with which guinea-pig tests agree with the findings of tests in humans. In addition, the frequencies of false positive and false negative predictive findings are considered and statistically analysed. The results clearly demonstrate the superiority of adjuvant tests (complete Freund's adjuvant) in determining skin sensitizers and the overall superiority of the guinea-pig maximization test in providing results similar to those obtained by human testing. A procedure is suggested for utilizing adjuvant and non-adjuvant test methods for characterizing compounds as of weak, moderate or strong sensitizing potential.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-6915
1873-6351
DOI:10.1016/S0278-6915(82)80011-2